Here’s more evidence that the tariffs on Chinese imports are working. As reported in the above-linked article, Emerson Electric now plans to move manufacturing back to the U.S. It’s a complete reversal from their strategy of only ten years ago.
In 2009, the chief executive of Emerson Electric Co. bluntly told investors at a Chicago conference what many of his counterparts at other manufacturing firms would only say privately. “I’m not going to hire anybody in the United States. I’m moving,” David Farr said as he blasted U.S. taxes and regulations and called it an easy decision to expand in India and China.
A decade later, Farr has made a stunning reversal: Emerson now plans to build at least three new U.S. plants and is already expanding existing domestic operations. Farr saw a new era of U.S. protectionism coming before Trump’s election – and started planning accordingly, he said in an interview with Reuters at the company’s sprawling headquarters near St. Louis, Missouri.
“For the first time now, I’m looking for best-cost U.S. locations” to build factories, he said.
Trump’s election, Farr said, accelerated a political shift against free trade policy that is now transforming many U.S. firms’ domestic investment strategy. Protectionist policies — especially toward China — are now a rare point on which many Democrats and Trump agree, relegating formerly bold Republican free traders to the sidelines.
The article goes on to provide some details of Emerson’s plans, particularly to spend $425 million on capital projects in the U.S., including $250 million for new manufacturing facilities.
And it’s not just Emerson:
Farr’s new take on U.S. investment reflects a broader questioning of overseas expansions, especially in China, for both political and operational reasons. A survey of top managers at 500 U.S. companies conducted in December by investment bank UBS AG found that 31 percent have moved or are moving production facilities to avoid tariffs. Fifty-eight percent said they expect tariffs to “have a positive impact on domestic investment.”
It’s not just the tariffs. Farr seems to be disillusioned with manufacturing in China.
Forces beyond politics are pushing manufacturers like Emerson to reconsider investments in China, including rising labor and logistics costs there …
… Emerson’s renewed commitment to U.S. manufacturing is also part of a larger move by global manufacturers to produce more goods in the regions where they are consumed to save on transportation costs.
I believe there are other factors at work here too. The domestic Chinese economy is flattening out at a far lower level than CEOs expected. They dreamt of a nation of more than a billion people becoming western-style consumers in the mold of Americans, making China a market four times the size of America. It hasn’t happened because gross overpopulation in China strangles their per capita consumption. They built a lot of capacity in China to serve a market that never materialized – capacity that was then dependent on exports to make it profitable. Along with higher wages and high shipping costs, Trump’s tariffs have eroded their profits even further. Supplying the American market from China no longer makes sense.
This story, and the one I posted about yesterday – about BMW putting on hold its plans to export EV’s from China – are just tiny examples of the effect that tariffs have in driving manufacturing back to the U.S. Just imagine the potential as this begins to snowball. Imagine how many factories would have to be built and how many people would have to be hired to staff them to make all of the products you see on the shelves at the box stores today that are all sourced from China. There would be an economic explosion in this country the likes of which haven’t been seen since the end of World War II.
The tide is turning against the failed concepts of free trade and globalization. It’s crumbling right before our eyes. The very fact that Reuters, a pro free trade and pro globalization publication until now, saw fit to even publish this information is evidence in itself of changing sentiment.
And kudos to Reuters for pointing out that Republicans were even more guilty than Democrats for pushing the free trade globalization agenda to the detriment of the American people, and that Trump has led the charge against it. Nice to see that some on both sides of the aisle are getting on the bandwagon.