While browsing the news on the internet this morning, I came across a couple of very interesting and surprising opinion pieces from two different commentators. They deal with different subjects, but subjects that share the common link that is the focus of this blog. I’ll first address the opinion piece by Tucker Carlson of Fox News (link provided above) because I found it to be the most surprising.
Now, before I start, and so that I don’t lose half of my readers right out of the box, don’t get the impression that, because I read Fox News, I’m a Republican and posting this just to advance the Republican agenda. I scan all the major news outlets, including Fox, in order to get stories that the others often won’t even cover. I’m an independent and have bashed both parties especially hard for doing the bidding of their corporate benefactors when they champion policies designed to keep growing our population when it’s increasingly evident that, while boosting GDP and corporate profits, it’s eroding our quality of life.
That said, I was curious where Carlson was going with this piece titled “The word we live in cannot last, but that’s not necessarily a tragedy.” What is it about our world that he thinks can’t last? Too many liberal politicians? Too much “wokeness?” Too much drift toward socialism?
It’s none of that. Yes, he gets in a couple of digs aimed at Democrats – nothing surprising there. What is surprising is that it’s an overpopulated world that he sees that can’t last. He asks the question, “… how many people is too many?” I was shocked! That’s exactly the question that my proposed amendment to the constitution would force politicians to consider when setting immigration policy. Why can’t politicians see it and do something about it?
He then goes on to answer that question:
In Washington, you will never hear that question. More bodies in a country mean more power for the people who run it. Big nations need big governments. Politicians always want more people to rule, so the incentive for unrestrained population growth is baked right into the system.
The consequences of that?
The larger a bureaucracy becomes, the more impersonal it gets. Past a certain size, organizations of any kind lose their regard for people. As they get bigger, they get blunter, more soulless and cruel.
It’s true. If there’s one thing that economists get right, it’s the law of supply and demand. As the supply of anything increases, the cheaper it gets. Humanity is no different. The more our numbers grow, the more devalued and cheaper human life becomes, to the point that an individual is practically worthless. You don’t matter. There’s plenty more eager to replace you.
It’s gratifying and encouraging to see that other people with influence are beginning to see the big picture and ask the right questions. I encourage you to read the whole piece yourselves, and I’ll leave it at that.