The above-linked article is a comparison of Biden’s positions on immigration and Trump’s position and record on the same issue. The article has a pro-Biden bias, casting his positions as having compassion for immigrants, while casting Trump’s positions as being more heartless and cruel. Putting aside that bias, however, the comparison is relatively accurate.
Before going further, for the benefit of those new to this web site, my purpose is to bring attention to an economic consequence of population growth that has escaped economists because of their refusal to even consider the subject. Simply put, beyond some optimum population density, further population growth begins to erode per capita consumption and, with it, employment. While the macro economy continues to grow, it doesn’t grow at the same pace as the population. The result is a bigger pie, but smaller slices for everyone. Incrementally worsening poverty is the inescapable result.
With that said, let’s now talk about immigration. Many claims are made about the supposed benefits of immigration and why it should continue. It’s often said that immigrants are the engine of our economy, that they account for 25% of all new business start-ups, for example. Just in the last few days, I heard it said that 19% of all long-haul truck drivers in America are immigrants. Immigrants are doctors, engineers, scientists, professors, and so on. At the other end of the scale, immigrants pick our crops, clean our hotel rooms, and do all of the other jobs that Americans seem loathe to do.
Regarding that last point, there’s some element of truth. Few Americans work those jobs, but is it because they don’t like to work hard, or is it because the pay is too low? I’d argue that many American workers would eagerly leave minimum wage jobs to do those other jobs if they paid more. The wages are low because of the unlimited supply of immigrants who see those wages as a huge step up from what they can aspire to in their own countries.
As for those other workers – the entrepreneurs, the professional people, the long-haul truckers and skilled tradesmen, it’s true that a significant percentage are immigrants, but that’s only because a significant percentage of the population is immigrants. They’re no more likely to fill those roles than native-born Americans. Immigrants don’t possess any unique skills or powers to boost the economy. They’re just people, and they want the same thing that all people want – to make a living and provide for their families.
Another claim often made is that America is enriched by the diversity that immigration provides. Diversity, it is said, is a source of strength for our economy. America is enriched by people with different backgrounds and different perspectives.
It can’t be argued that it isn’t interesting to learn about different cultures. But the claim that diversity is a source of economic strength? Baloney. That’s a myth, invented and perpetuated by those who stand to benefit from never-ending population growth. Who are they? Corporations. More people equate to more total sales and a bigger bottom line, while all of the negative consequences of population growth be damned. Don’t believe me? Go to the CIA World Fact Book web site and bring up a list of countries ranked by GDP per capita. You’ll find the top of the list dominated by countries practically devoid of diversity. Ranking high on the list is Ireland, a nation with virtually no diversity but, in terms of trade balance per capita, kicks America’s ass in trade far worse than any other country. Diversity has nothing to do with economic prowess.
In the final analysis, the ONLY effect of immigration is to grow the population. Growing the population makes sense only if you believe that we need more people – bigger and more crowded cities, more traffic, more demand on resources, more carbon emitters, more trash in the landfills, and so on. Worst of all, if you believe in the premise of this web site – that a growing population will doom the U.S. to worsening poverty by eroding per capita consumption – further population growth is tantamount to slow-motion economic suicide.
Joe Biden is an advocate for more immigration and, thus, more rapid population growth. That position isn’t surprising and it’s not something unique to Democrats. Virtually every Republican takes the same stance, though they tend to pay more lip service to opposing illegal immigration. Both parties are in agreement on immigration. Why? Because that’s the stance that their corporate benefactors pay them to take.
Only very recently have some environmentalists begun to awaken to the fact that they’ve been hoodwinked by the faux-environmentalists who would have you believe that the planet can be saved from the vast array of negative consequences of worsening over-population through technological gimmicks like cutting carbon emissions, paving the way for more “sustainable development,” a corporate euphemism for more population growth. In light of this awakening, policies that promote population growth may soon seem out-of-step with the reality of the challenges that confront this planet.
Trump is unique in being opposed to both legal and illegal immigration alike. If we can believe him, his motivation is his belief that immigrants hold down wages and take jobs from American workers. Is there an element of racism? He denies it.
I wish Trump were a more likable person – more eloquent, more compassionate, less hot-tempered, a better role model. Would I vote for Biden over Trump if Biden took a hard line on immigration like Trump? You bet, especially if he also favored restoring a balance of trade through the use of tariffs, as Trump does. If there were no differences in their positions on these two critical issues, I’d vote for Biden in a heartbeat. But that’s not the case.