Obama’s Asia Trip: Bringing Home the Bacon or Giving Away the Farm?


It was widely reported in the media yesterday (as in this above-linked CNBC article), that President Obama, during a visit to India, the first stop on his 10-day tour of Asia, has reached a deal with India worth $10 billion in U.S. exports and 54,000 jobs for American workers.  It seems that India has agreed to buy ten C-17 cargo planes. 

My biggest concern is what the president may have conceded to win that agreement.  This trip by Obama is only the latest in a decades-long string of countless trade junkets by American officials designed to “open new markets” to American goods.  The result has been a cumulative trade deficit of $10 trillion that has bankrupted our country.  The problem is that such negotiations always begin with a demand that the U.S. first eliminate subsidies and cut tariffs.  Only then do we get some vague assurance of buying U.S. products.  The U.S. then eagerly goes to work cutting subsidies and tariffs, opening the door to a tidal wave of imports, and the administration moves on to other matters, never bothering to follow through and check that the other party kept their side of the bargain.  That deal is then added to the long list of others that the next president promises to “enforce” in order to halt the rise in the trade deficit and the loss of jobs to foreign manufacturers.

Secondly, one has to wonder whether India had already planned to purchase these planes anyway.   Even if this is a new commitment to purchase American goods, India is a nation with one sixth of the world’s population, and all the president can scrounge out of them is 54,000 jobs?!?!?  At this rate, the very best we can hope for is that he’ll return from this 10-day trip with about 300,000 new jobs for Americans.  But 18 million Americans are out of work!

Mr. President, with all due respect, if you’re really interested in cutting the trade deficit and restoring manufacturing jobs, quit wasting your time.  Get your ass back home, sit down at your desk in the west-wing office, and start re-writing trade policy that imposes tariffs and limits imports, forcing manufacturers to make the products we use right here in the U.S.  Send the World Trade Organization a letter, canceling our membership.  If somebody wants to sell us something, fine, but no more than they’re willing to buy from us.  How about that as the starting point for trade negotiations?

It’s time for the U.S. to end its role as village idiot in the global trade community.

2 Responses to Obama’s Asia Trip: Bringing Home the Bacon or Giving Away the Farm?

  1. MikeF says:


    NAFTA was officially entered into on January 1, 1994 and the World Trade Organization on January 1, 1995. America has lost viable employment every year since.

    It’s that simple. We have indisputable evidence over a 16 year period that these agreements are harmful to Middle America…yet, our government encourages more of the same.

    Encouraging additional free trade with the poorest most densely populated countries on earth equates to the death of Middle America on the installment plan.

    The election simply gave these thieves two more years in which to organize a one world order.

    Until such time that ALL of the career politicians are removed from power, there will be no positive nor substantive change. Until Americans manufacture, mine, and grow the needs of Americans, there is no hope.

    Time is no longer on our side.

    • Pete Murphy says:

      Actually, the World Trade Organization dates all the way back to the Global Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, enacted in 1947. There was essentially a name-change in 1994 when it was renamed the WTO and the GATT name was dropped. As a result, our surplus of trade steadily eroded until, in 1975, we enjoyed our last surplus and have racked up a ten trillion dollar trade deficit since.

      I’m not sure removing career politicians from power is the answer if we simply replace them with other people who then hire the same economists for their economic team. I’m afraid nothing will change until the field of economics takes off its population blinders and begins to see the world clearly for the first time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: