Trade Deficit Worsens Again in March

The government released the March trade figures yesterday (link provided above) and the good news for the Obama administration is that exports jumped, enough to put the U.S. back on track for his goal of doubling exports in five years.  The bad news is that imports jumped even more, resulting in the trade deficit growing by another $1.0 billion.  Here’s a chart of exports and imports vs. Obama’s goal.

Obamas Goal to Double Exports

Of course, Obama’s real goal, by doubling exports, is to restore a balance of trade, eliminating the trade deficit.  By that measure, we’re not doing very well.  Here’s a chart:

Balance of Trade

Returning to the issue of exports, even that news is a bit tainted when you look more closely.  Of the $4.6 billion boost in exports, $0.9 billion was oil and other petroleum products (as if we need to be exporting oil), $0.7 billion was gold and other precious metals, and $0.1 billion was corn.  None of which adds much in the way of jobs.

The big jump in imports was lead by oil, but included almost every other category as well.

At the current rate of increase, instead of eliminating the trade deficit in five years, we’re on track for it to explode to $100 billion per month – or $1.2 trillion per year.  It was global trade imbalances that lead to the global financial collapse last year, and nothing has changed to avoid a repeat in years to come.  Every month another $40 billion is drained from our economy, and another $40 billion comes back to the U.S. looking for a bubble to inflate.  Right now it’s a bubble in U.S. treasuries which, when it bursts, will send interest rates through the roof.

But few Americans care about asset bubbles.  What they do care about is jobs and nothing robs our economy of jobs like the trade deficit, which currently accounts for six million lost manufacturing jobs directly and millions of other jobs involved in supporting manufacturing operations.

Obama’s plan to export our way out of our trade deficit in five years is failing.  As the global financial crisis fades from view, the trade deficit is slowly returning to the status quo in which rising exports are swamped by a rising tide of imports.  Will it take a second global economic collapse (or a third?) to jolt him into meaningful action on trade policy?  I wonder if even that would do it.


7 Responses to Trade Deficit Worsens Again in March

  1. Mark Hall says:


    It appears that things are finally returning to normal.

    Our foreclosure rates are at record highs.

    Our federal deficits are at record highs.

    Our state government deficits are at record highs.

    Our “actual” unemployment and underemployment rates are at post-war record highs.

    Our welfare & food stamp recipients are at record highs.

    Our trade deficits are on track to return to record highs.

    These are all positive signs if you are a Wall Street banker pushing and selling U.S. treasuries while at the same time buying derivatives that short or bet against the U.S. economy.

    Just think, somewhere out there some person or persons will become fabulously wealthy by simply just watching our government officials do NOTHING!

  2. Andy says:

    “It was global trade imbalances that lead to the global financial collapse last year, …”

    Complete nonsense. It was an old fashioned bank run between firms in the shadow banking system.

    • Pete Murphy says:

      It wasn’t a “bank run,” Andy. The problem started with sub-prime mortgage failures – mortgages that were made with the encouragement of the government (through Fannie and Freddie) in a desperate bid to pull foreigners’ trade dollars back into the economy. The collapse accelerated when the failing mortgages then triggered defaults in mortgage-backed securities. It was global trade imbalances that fed the financial madness.

  3. Andy says:

    “But few Americans care about asset bubbles”

    How can you care when Americans can’t get out of their 401k unless they first quit their job.

    Automation has killed most of the manufacturing jobs.
    There used to be a lot of farming jobs too. What do you suppose happened to them?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: