Obama Approach to Economy Faltering

With the first 100 days of the Obama administration in the rear-view mirror, the effects of his approach to the economy – especially his approach to the trade deficit – are beginning to come into focus.  And it’s not the picture they hoped for.  Yesterday, the Obama administration increased its project for this year’s federal budget deficit by $89 billion, an admission that the economy is not recovering at the rate they had planned.  

And just minutes ago this morning, it was announced that the March trade deficit rose from $26.0 billion in February to $27.6 billion in March, ending a dramatic, several-month decline.  The rise wasn’t unexpected, but the reason was.  In spite of the fact that oil prices rose as expected, that rise was offset by falling imports.  But what was an unpleasant surprise was that exports also fell a sharp 2.4%.  Exports held up surprisingly well in February, perhaps the result of the rest of the world trying to hold up their end of the bargain struck at the G20 summit in London, when they promised to boost their own economies and start buying more American products, in exchange for Obama’s promise to disavow any moves toward protectionism.  I predicted that approach was doomed to failure, and so it is.  It lasted about a month.  

Some of the stimulus measures taken by the Obama administration are having some minimal effect in slowing our economic decline.  How could they not?  Pour trillions of dollars into the economy, through economic stimulus and through various measures to lower interest rates and boost spending, and it has to have an effect.  But the results are disappointing.  While job losses have moderated slightly, they’re still at a level that would elicit bugged eyes and dropped jaws from economists during any other period.  And home purchases have ticked upward ever-so-slightly, like the twitch of a limb of some poor animal that has come to a violent end.  

Obama has said repeatedly that a recovery in the manufacturing sector is crucial to revival of our economy, especially as the finance sector fades into oblivion.  But falling exports bode ill for any such recovery.  This is exactly the scenario I predicted in my 2009 Predictions.  Obama has relied upon the same approach to our trade problems that decades of experience has proven to be a failure – trying to talk our way out of the deficit instead of taking meaningful measures.  Perhaps he thought that he could make it succeed by simply trying harder, bringing his charisma to bear and shaming other world leaders into pulling their weight.  This will go on for some time as the administration clings to hope that their approach will begin to take hold.  

But it won’t. It can’t.  It ignores the economic realities associated with trading freely with overpopulated nations and ignores our own growing problem of overpopulation, and the consequences of these for unemployment.  The question becomes what “plan B” might be.  He will have only two choices:  stick with “plan A,” relying on even more stimulus or begin moving away from the extreme free trade end of the spectrum of trade policy, which means beginning to adopt some forms of protectionism, whether it’s import quotas or tariffs.  Sticking with Plan A for too long will leave too little time for Plan B to work and will assure a place in history as a one-term president and a failure.

Advertisements

6 Responses to Obama Approach to Economy Faltering

  1. Mark Hall says:

    Pete:

    I AGREE…I AGREE…I AGREE…………

    We need to do SOMETHING SOON….

    We’re ALL (Federal, State & Local Governments along with normal individuals) GOING BROKE playing, watching and listening to this OLD RECORD….

    Mark

  2. mtnmike says:

    Pete,

    You hit on a wonderful truth when you said “the finance sector is dying.” It was never real and was never based on physical productivity. Our fantasy-land of modern finance was dependent on more and more money being dumped into the market and ever increasing complex scams such as Credit Default Swaps and Derivatives.

    Manufacturing is however real, as is agriculture and all of the peripheral businesses that surround both.

    Kenneth Boulding said, “There is no such thing as economics, only social science applied to economic problems.” Is that a mouthful or what?

  3. Randy says:

    21st Century

    Isaac Newton vs Charles Ponzi

    And the winner by TKO in first round is, Mr. Ponzi

  4. Randy says:

    But really why would anyone buy an american car now when they are going to be nothing but a bunch of MBA suits collecting big fees for slapping a brand name on an import…you know like the Chevrolet Aveo.
    Its like those suckers buying a Porsche with its Volkswagen, Audi, etc etc components.

  5. mtnmike says:

    Randy,

    I like your Newton vs. Ponzi scenario.

    We are ignoring the impossibility of growth as our only avenue for survival. Many times, less is more.

  6. […] to address the trade deficit in a meaningful way, he’d be a one-term president.  (See https://petemurphy.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/obama-approach-to-economy-faltering/.)  I was wrong.  Although, predictably, unemployment is no better today than it was in 2009, it […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: