End Traffic Congestion


It seems that even economists aren’t all that enamored with some of the consequences of growth.  In this linked editorial, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, former Labor Department chief economist, bemoans traffic congestion and suggests that new GPS technology be employed to tax drivers for miles driven and routes taken in an effort to cut down traffic in congested areas. 

A couple of observations are in order.  First of all, the surest method to prevent traffic congestion from becoming worse is to stop putting more drivers on the road.  That means a plan to stabilize the population.  It’ll stabilize eventually anyway, either through a lower birth rate or a higher death rate, so why not do it now before congestion becomes worse?  Building more roads and more lanes won’t help.  Take it from someone who pre-dates the interstate highway system, more roads and lanes only enable more population growth and they fill with more traffic volume faster than they can be built.  Stabilizing the population is the only sure way to stop the congestion problem from getting worse.

Secondly, while schemes like that proposed by Ms. Furchtgott-Roth will certainly be necessary if the population isn’t stabilized, it will ultimately lead to a decline in per capita consumption of vehicles, accompanied by a decline in per capita consumption of everything associated with operating and maintaining those vehicles.  That means a decline in per capita employment in those industries.  You may be inclined to think that those displaced workers will simply find employment in other industries.  Think again.  As a society becomes more and more densely populated, the per capita consumption of virtually everything, with the exception of food and clothing, declines as well.  The end result is rising unemployment and poverty. 

We would be better served if economists spent time stuck in traffic pondering the ultimate consequences of their pro-growth agenda instead of looking no further than the bumper in front of them to imagine technological band-aids to keep their theories patched together.


One Response to End Traffic Congestion

  1. Good Morning Pete,

    My mention of your theory on my site yesterday produced both comments and e-mails and so I elaborated a little in my article today.

    Your article today suggests my constant argument that our country suffers from that of being governed under the discipline of crisis management.

    There is no plan other than getting by in four year electoral cycles. Our underlying economic cornerstone of exponential growth is not only mathematically impossible, it creates the problems that government then attempts to solve without correcting the basis of the original problem!

    Is that not the text book definition of insanity?

    Limit driving, which limits commerce and tax collection, and then raise fuel taxes which further limits commerce and then subsidize commerce which requires more taxes! Yikes the insane are running the asylum.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: