I’d like to weigh in with some preliminary thoughts about McCain’s VP pick, governor Sarah Palin of Alaska. But, first of all, I’ve included a link above to a blog written by an Alaskan that contains some good information about Mrs. Palin. The blogger seems to be biased toward the Democrats but it’s still interesting to hear his/her perspective. It details an ongoing “scandal” that she’s embroiled in. When I read the details of the “scandal” I had to laugh. It pales in comparison to what’s happening here in southeast Michigan. If that’s the worst someone can come up with on Palin, don’t bother me with it.
With that said, here’s how I see it. I evaluate McCain’s choice on three issues:
- If she had to take over from McCain, what would her position be on population management, especially immigration? It’s impossible to know at this point. I doubt that the subject comes up much in Alaska politics. But, being the governor of the least densely populated state in the nation, she’s probably clueless about the challenges presented by overpopulation and legal and illegal immigration. A good indication is the fact that she doesn’t believe in global warming, a huge strike against her. Even McCain has accepted that we need to act on this issue. Why would he pick someone so out-of-touch on one of the most critical issues of our time, one that is exacerbated every day by further rampant population growth?
- If she had to take over from McCain, what would be her position on trade and the trade deficit? Again, it seems impossible to know. I imagine that, for an Alaskan, the subject of the economy boils down to three things: oil, oil and oil. In that regard, I give her high marks for raising taxes on the oil companies to generate revenue for her state and to balance her budget, much to their chagrin. Score one for fiscal responsibility and toughness. But her husband is an oil company employee. That will raise serious conflict of interest questions in any energy policy matters. Also, I don’t like the fact that she favors drilling in ANWR. I’ve come out in support of offshore drilling, but drilling in ANWR is where I draw the line. The environmental risks are too great. But, back to the original question, there’s no evidence yet to suggest what her attitudes are toward our trade deficit.
- In general, is she ready to take over the presidency? Some are saying that, even though she’s only been a governor for two years, she already has more “executive” experience that either Obama or Biden. While technically true, I suppose, it’s ludicrous to suggest that such experience would prove more valuable than experience gained in the Senate. Looking back at recent previous presidents, most had gubernatorial experiences. Some were highly successful: Reagan and Clinton (though I think Clinton was simply in the right place at the right time, at the dawn of the explosion in PC, internet and cell phone technology). Some were abysmal failures: Carter and George W. Bush. So what makes a successful president vs. a failure? I think it comes down primarily to intelligence, judgment, leadership and core values.
So what does McCain’s choice say about him in this regard? First of all, Palin was chosen for political reasons first, giving lower priority to what would be the best interest of the nation if something were to happen to McCain. I don’t see her as ready to take the reins of the presidency and the free world. This choice was obviously made in a play for disaffected Hillary voters and to shore up McCain’s shaky standing with the right wing of the party, especially pro-lifers and guns rights advocates. But if McCain really wanted to attract the female vote, especially disaffected Hillary voters, why not choose another woman who’s more qualified, like Kay Bailey Hutchinson, the senator from Texas? I think this play will backfire, insulting Hillary supporters with the thinking that they’ll vote for anything wearing a skirt (or a pantsuit). If it’s pro-lifers and gun rights advocates he’s after, there are plenty of choices much more qualified to lead the nation. And what will happen when Palin is stood up next to Biden in a debate?
This just seems like a really weird pick and calls into question McCain’s judgment, one of the key character traits that should be factored into our choice for president. I am reminded of Ross Perot’s choice of admiral what’s-his-name (the name escapes me) as his running mate. It completely destroyed whatever credibility Perot had. The admiral’s performance in the VP debate was one of the most embarrassing moments in modern political history. Perhaps Palin will prove me wrong. Perhaps she has the makings of an incredible leader. But that’s not a risk I’d be willing to take.